The loss of NASA's Shuttle Columbia was a tragic event, as were past losses such as the Challenger Shuttle and Apollo I. Does this mean, as current media coverage suggests, that we should halt the Space Program? Absolutely not!
Most Americans do not understand the benefits of NASA's space program. Their argument goes something like this: "O.K., we've proven that we can leave Earth and orbit the globe. How many times do we need to do this? It's too dangerous and costly!"
As a nation, we have a high percentage of people who are clueless of the benefits that the average American receives from our efforts to explore and understand the cosmos. Within hours of the Space Shuttle Columbia's tragic end, news channels were providing their own speculation and questions that can be summarized as follows: "Of course, this tragedy obviously brings into question the entire Space Program and the beliefs of NASA promoters that we should continue this massive spending instead of using the funds on domestic problems such as feeding the poor." Does it?! We think not, and we're convinced many of our readers agree, as do other educated people across America and the globe. The purpose of this article is to reinforce this position and to educate others who may be unaware of the windfall of benefits that touch nearly every aspect of our lives. We must fully understand what we receive from our space-related efforts in order to continue. Our efforts at exploration run deep throughout history. It's is what we do as evolving humans. It is our desire to understand our planet and the Universe in which we live... and it's a noble and necessary undertaking.
We cannot cover all the benefits in this article. There are thousands of them. We welcome your input on key areas we may have missed. Please send your comments and additions to us - CONTACT US.
Before we discuss the benefits of the space program, we must address its risks. In NASA's infancy, everyone knew that sitting on top of a mountain of rocket fuel, and lighting it, was very risky business. Why is it that so many have come to believe that space missions are without risk? The reason is that we've have been so successful at it in recent decades. We've only lost two manned Shuttle spacecraft in over 100 attempts. The media is also to blame because they don't bother covering all the tremendous successes. It's old news. They only sensationalize the disasters for ratings and advertising dollars. Ironically, if it were the other way around, with only 2 successes out of 100 attempts, they would have probably have extensive coverage of the successes as they did in the Apollo days.
EVERYDAY BENEFITS FROM THE SPACE PROGRAM
|
(STS-107 mission)
(STS-107 mission)
|
Excerpt from President Bush's Address following Columbia DisasterPresident Bush rarely makes a statement on which we agree. However, in his Address to the Nation, he astonished us with the following words."In an age when space flight has come to seem almost routine, it is easy to overlook the dangers of travel by rocket, and the difficulties of navigating the fierce outer atmosphere of the Earth. These astronauts knew the dangers, and the faced them willingly, knowing they had a high and noble purpose in life.Please note that we intentionally omitted the rest of his speech, most of which dealt with God, prayer, our creator and even a quote from the prophet Isaiah!"The cause in which they died will continue. Mankind is led into the darkness beyond our world by the inspiration of discovery and the longing to understand. Our journey into space will go on." ( President George W. Bush, 2/1/2003, Address to the Nation )
An Opposing View from Fox News Channel
Many of you are familiar with the highly-biased commentary of Fox News. In researching for this article we found the following commentary on NASA's space program. At first, we were surprised and outraged. But, considering the source, it no longer surprises us. Fox is known for its highly-conservative, pro-religious, liberal-slamming, uneducated opinions."Many... make grandiose claims about the many benefits showered upon our nation because we sent a few people to the moon, or into orbit. ... Many of these claims are hyperbolic. Most of them are false. ... Unfortunately, proponents have to rely on such overhyped claims because the actual benefits of our manned space program have been relatively sparse. ... Certainly there is some spinoff technology benefit from the program--it's impossible to engage in any high-tech endeavor without occasionally coming up with serendipitous results. And of course, there's occasionally some cross fertilization with military space activities (though from a taxpayer standpoint, disappointly little). ... Proponents need to come up with real goals, and real reasons, that can resonate with the American people--something difficult to do with the program as currently planned, in which we spend billions for a Motel 6 in space that can support only half a dozen people, even if current plans come to fruition." ( FoxNews.com, [9] )We hope the "Benefits" listed above 'resonate with the American people' more than the small-minded opinions presented by the Fox News Channel!
Other Notable Items (of a Religious Nature) Debunked by the Space Program(For more on these religious claims, see our article "Science, Truth and the Church".)
- Heaven has not been encountered on any NASA mission.
- Earth is not flat and does not have an underside.
- Earth is not held up by pillars.
- Earth is not the center of the universe.
- Stars are not fixed and are not hung in the sky.
- The Moon does not generate its own light.
- It is not possible for the Sun and Moon to stand still.
- Meteorites and comets are not stars of heaven falling to Earth in a sign of God's fury.
- Solar eclipses are the result of the Moon's shadow, not God's anger.
References & Related Links:
1. "Space Shuttle Benefits", "Space Station Benefits", "Exploring Mars and Beyond", NASA's Human Spaceflight, http://spaceflight.nasa.gov.
2. "Hydrogen-powered cars, other futuristic products all in a day’s work for NASA Space Product manager", NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, 12/18/02, http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM/news/releases/2002/02-316.html.
3. "NASA Pushes Everyday Trickle Down Of Space Technology", Space Daily, 11/19/02, http://www.spacedaily.com/news/industry-02f.html
4. "Space Shuttle Program Benefits Industry and Health", NASA release, Federation of American Scientists, 10/11/00, http://www.fas.org/news/usa/2000/usa-001012.htm.
5. "Technology Transfer Program - At Home with NASA", NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, http://techtran.msfc.nasa.gov/at_home.html
6. "Space Technology Hall of Fame", Space Foundation for NASA, http://www.spacetechhalloffame.org.
7. "Space on Earth: How Technology Transfer Benefits Humanity", SPACE.com, 1/1/03, http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/tech_hallofame_030101-1.html.
8. Spinoff. NASA's magazine covering spinoff technologies from its space program. http://www.nasatech.com/Spinoff/.
9. "Spinning Spinoff", by Rand Simberg, 1/9/03, Fox News Channel, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,75102,00.html.
10. "Iraqis Call Shuttle Disaster God's Vengeance", Reuters, 2/1/03,
11. "Space Product Development", NASA's project for encouraging businesses in developing products based on space technology, http://spd.nasa.gov.
12. "Earth Benefits", NASA's Ames Research Center, Life Sciences Division, http://lifesci.arc.nasa.gov/earthbenefitspage.html